Notes on: Dumagane, C. (2016) Exploring the
narratives of the few: British African Caribbean
Male graduates of elite universities in England
and Wales. Doctoral thesis. School of social
sciences. Cardiff University. January 2016.
[unpublished as far as I know]
Dave Harris
[I have notes on a few central chapters only. ]
This claims to be based on CRT especially counter
narratives and it combines Bourdieu with CRT.
Chapter 3. From race to
micro-aggressions
Hall is used to explain that race is also
connected to class and socio-historical contexts,
that biological research can discredit the notion
that there is any distinct human race, but that
'racist signification' (31) sees Whiteness as
natural, neutral and so the individual is
universally taken to be White and male. These have
become to some extent entrenched. An ethnic group
is identified by a shared cultural heritage,
language or dialect and the link with race is
still problematic.
Back to Hall
and the historical link with colonialism and the
White man's burden in Britain. Ethnicity becomes a
'strategically necessary concept' (32), most
obviously as a rationalisation for slavery.
Nevertheless there has been a lot of debate about
how Black or Black culture have actually been
defined and what the term includes. Particular
debate in the literature concerning the
intersections between race and class. [Thisis
quite a light skim over the issue compared with
actual Hall]. There have been debates about how to
teach history and culture in secondary school
curricula. Some people think that the definitions
are always being renegotiated. They may offer
double consciousness to some participants, and a
notion of tension or struggle
Contemporary forms take their shape from elites
and appear in elite speaking or writing [citing
van Dijk). Everyday racism may be less often
discussed however, and much research done so far
is conducted in the USA — Simpson is cited to
define it as something that occurs in everyday
settings not just 'overt, attitudinal or
behavioural racism' (35) it is more complex, a
matter of connections between individual prejudice
and larger structural societal problems, operating
at small scale local levels and larger matters of
power abuse by dominant groups on a larger scale.
Systemic racism and everyday racism are less well
discussed, but they form the 'visible and
invisible systems of everyday racism, rooted in
racist prejudices and ideologies' (citing van Dijk
again). Many racist interactions may not be
conspicuous because racism and discrimination is
changing and now often involves 'subtle racial
micro-aggressions'.
This is a term coined by Peirce to refer to
'"subtle cumulative mini assault (s)"' Solorozano
2000 describes them as '"subtle insults… directed
toward people of colour, often automatically or
unconsciously"' (36). They can be behavioural and
environmental, intentional or unintentional. They
might be found in work circumstances. BME groups
often become keenly aware of them and develop
coping strategies. They are often subtle and this
makes them difficult to address or challenge.
Sue says that
perpetrators are often oblivious to their
insulting nature. He has categorised various
types. Many are apparent in British society. They
are socially shared and are linked to divisions
between us and them [Sue's table follows].
Modern racism is involved to become more subtle
symbolic and aversive. It can be masked.
Microaggressions are more nebulous more difficult
to recognise and accept, more difficult to
identify and prove, easily explained away as
inoffensive that have been misunderstood by
oversensitive individuals. POC may find it more
difficult to handle than explicit forms. Racism
complaints can be 'complicated and
counter-productive in university settings' (39),
especially if there are no particular official
strategies. Victims may adopt coping strategies
which can include suffering in silence or
distancing themselves, for example explaining them
away as ignorance rather than calculated racism,
requiring no confrontation. His participants have
lots of examples.
Aversive racism may cause even more 'racial anger,
frustration and [low] self-esteem' (40). It may be
institutionalised within the habitus of UK elite
institutions including universities. One POC says
for example that he and another lecturer of colour
were more severely cross-examined at entry
interview and that he encountered racist views in
lectures. A dean at Cambridge said there was a
real reluctance to discuss race because the
University '"appears to consider itself post
racist"' (41). Systemic racism has been researched
through 'admission decisions, recruitment and
retention processes relative to ethnic minority
students', but less frequently exploring British
African Caribbean Men (BACM) men's experiences.
On to gender, as performance via Butler, and
gender in intersection with race and class, a
necessary focus for his research. He goes on to
define culture as a matter of language and customs
and so on, citing Bourdieu, who also says that the
best of these things are recognised as such by the
dominant classes. Hall's definition is thrown in
for some reason. Hammersley and Woods are cited on
the intersections of class race and gender. There
is some work on subcultures as countercultures
which are also related to social class and produce
forms of identity for adolescents which can link
to race and masculinity so that 'Black boys at
school ascribed to a Black male subculture
interweaving gender and race' (43) which can
explain some of their disengagement. They are also
seen as leaders of style and street culture, [some
more stuff on this later on on the 'slick walk' or
the 'trendsetting style of dress' from Gillborn
and Sewell respectively] although teachers see
them as '"devils" in classrooms' [citing Sewell],
excessively masculine. One coping strategy
involves not doing well at school because it is
not seen as being cool or hard. African Caribbean
boys have developed their own subcultures as a
response shown in music, hair and dress, and their
music often stresses violence as in American rap
There is some work on teacher expectations
[including Gillborn and Mac an Ghaill] and this
might be a factor in unusual levels of exclusion,
funnelling into SEN schools, negative
interpretations, early condemnations to failure,
entry to lower tiers of GCSE exams and so on.
Some CRT researchers argue that Black men's voices
need to be centred in research so that their
perspectives can be understood outside of this
framework. We should do this through
intersectionality, however. [Not at all sure how].
Post racialism is particularly flawed, especially
when it focuses on meritocracy as the main route
to success and minimises class and racial concern.
Intersectional approaches stress relationships,
like those between CRT, Black feminist theory and
intersectionality and the way they have all been
used to explain class inequalities. At the same
time, race because of its debatable position as a
social construct [and he still puts it in inverted
commas in this chapter] has been relatively
ignored and it is now necessary to restore it as a
central tenet. [Rather a soft version of CRT
here].
Chapter 4. Bourdieu, Rational
Action and meritocracy.
The key terminology here are 'habitus, field,
capital and cultural reproduction' from Bourdieu,
and Rational Action Theory and Meritocracy from
Goldthorpe and Glaesser and Cooper 2012.
Intersectionality of class and race as discussed
in this background. Class and gender has been
discussed in connection with Bourdieu as in Skeggs
or Reay, but there are some early pieces on race
as well.
The early works in Algeria analyse colonialism and
struggles afterwards and Bourdieu was a soldier at
one stage. He saw precolonial Algeria as having
been destabilised by colonialism and agree to some
extent with Fanon on the negative psychological
effects. His first major work was the Sociology
of Algeria followed by The Algerians,
where colonialism was seen as racial oppression,
and a '"caste system racial segregation"' , taking
a '"Manichean"' form (51). Racism was a
rationalisation backed by force. He stressed the
notion of caste to bring out weberian notions of
'race supported by political privilege'rather than
just class. He thought that '"caste spirit stifles
class consciousness"' as did Fanon. The colonial
system itself was crucial and had to be
dismantled, by revolution. [I didn't know any of
this!]
Race was like class, based on 'an unequal
distribution of various capitals possessed by the
dominant [White] group' (52) which links with the
notion of Whiteness and White capital in people
like Gillborn or Solorzano. As with class habitus,
it is misrecognised by those who advocate merit.
It becomes its own 'form of symbolic violence',
seen in micro-aggressions. Bourdieu calls it
'"gentle, invisible violence, unrecognised as
such, chosen as much is undergone' [so partaking
of all the cunning of history as does class
discrimination?].
Social class clearly centrally effects BACM
performance, but this is often been background in
favour of neoliberal meritocratic policies. Skeggs
notes that that is because class differences have
become institutionalised and thus legitimated,
silenced. It is the same for BME people.
Bourdieu has the notion of field or site, distinct
regions which require membership based on
substantial knowledge, formal and informal,
including knowledge of academies, journals, gossip
and rumour. Dominant groups determine what is
valued and their system of domination is apparent
in all the values and positions [Rollock 2007 is
cited here for some reason]. Otherwise they are
arbitrary. Not all members are aware of the basis
of the evaluation because they have become
routinised, although there can be 'contention and
conflict' (55) as subordinated groups struggle to
gain power.
The struggles are fuelled by different types of
capital. There is a dynamic relation to habitus.
Some forms of habitus give greater access to
fields and provide greater resources than others.
Curriculum choices indicate institutional habitus,
for example, with private sector schools offering
the more traditional academic subjects.
The issue for his research is whether those BACM
at elite universities have come from middle-class
backgrounds or whether some working class ones
have acquired capital in other ways. What they
identify as the power differentials and in
particular whether they can challenge power
dynamics inside 'the existent White middle-class
habitus of the universities' or just accept them.
Whether there is a reproduction of the possession
of cultural capital between the generations for
BACM.
There is some work on the way in which that BME
from working-class and middle-class background
select HEI, using social capital [Ball, Reay and
David 2002], social connections: this seems to be
'"contingent choosers" and "embedded choosers"',
first generation working class or middle class
with a history of university attendance. Social
capital generally is associated with positive
outcomes both academically and social, although it
is usually seen as 'firmly rooted within networks'
(57) [some repetition of the work here, often
focusing on race]. Misrecognition 'is central to
the power dynamics and efficiency of education'
(58) where, in Bourdieu, capital becomes symbolic
capital and is misrecognised as arbitrary truth,
legitimate practical knowledge. His participants
were asked about the sort of social capital that
had influence their own achievement.
Cultural reproduction follows, for Bourdieu,
although the whole thing apparently runs on the
basis of individual ability or merit, because
'"the culture of the elite is so near to that of
the school"' (59), and esteemed forms of capital
are easier to acquire at home and during
childhood. This is disguised to some extent 'due
to an imperfect relationship between the
distribution of economic and cultural capital'
BME underachievement may be the result of social
class and it does have an independent effect, as
does gender, and there have been attempts to
measure the relative importance of the three
[Gillborn and Mirza 2000] [some data is quoted].
There is still an explanatory gap, however
especially for BME boys because of neighbourhood
pressures and low expectations [although a note
says that 'Black African Pakistani and Bangladeshi
pupils tend to perform better than Black Caribbean
and White students from disadvantaged backgrounds'
60]. There may also be a proximity to good
schools, or 'individual biographies'as factors.
Class might reinforce race. [We know a lot more
about this since the Sewell
Report]
Turning to Goldthorpe, he argued that the HE
system can offset the role of social class to some
extent [not a very good summary though, nothing on
relative and absolute social mobility, Goldthorpe
appears here as a simple meritocrat]. Rational
Action Theory suggests that people make decisions
on a cost benefit basis rather than being affected
by the habitus, and Glaesser and Cooper have tried
to bring these together.
Bottero takes Goldthorpe's use of RAT to explain
that 'the same attitudes and beliefs have largely
different results for those in differing class
locations'(62) and that the different distribution
of opportunities and risks in different class
locations are what affects their behaviour rather
than 'class cultures or beliefs'. Boudon also used
RAT to show how different destination goals and
calculations of costs of benefits among children
in different social class origins lead to
different educational pathways. This might be
compatible with Bourdieu and the argument that
their habituses are incompatible [Glaesser and
Cooper offer the example of leaving school to go
into an unskilled job is a reasonable ambition for
a working class person, but would be seen as
downward social mobility for a middle-class one] .
Reay has particularly argued that Bourdieu's
concepts can be adapted to analyse gender and
ethnicity. Cultural reproduction [is not
criticised with Sewell type data on social
mobility of some ethnic groups]. Bourdieu's strong
correlation between academic success and familial
cultural capital in France in the 70s is cited
uncritically.
He wants to explore his participants' experiences
using economic cultural and social capital and how
they confer different advantages and disadvantages
on his respondents, and how they turn into
symbolic capital. Cultural capital in particular
exists in embodied forms — '"long lasting
dispositions of the mind and body… Accent,
disposition, way of walking; objectified state in
the form of cultural goods, such as pictures,
books, music; and the institutionalised state
which reflect qualifications and institutionally
sanctioned forms of status"' [obviously from Distinction]
(64), and this can be transformed into economic
capital or educational qualifications. Social
capital is social obligations and connections
which can be transferred into economic capital,
forming social networks, being able to perform, 'a
quality that permits or facilitates achievement or
accomplishment'. Symbolic capital can be expressed
in '"accumulated prestige, celebrity,
consecration, or honour and is founded on a
dialectic of knowledge… And recognition"' (65): it
needs to be recognised as capital, by agents.
Again it can lead to economic acquisition, or at
least legitimise it, and the acquisition of
educational success as well.
In a field, for Bourdieu, a game is being played,
with rules although these are not codified, and
trump cards which are generally of value. Players
may hold different sorts of capital and will play
according to strategies to maximise the value of
their capital, trying to develop the best of the
objective chances [a rough summary of Bourdieu and
Wacquant he quotes on 65] [explicated rather
pointedly on the next page]. Willis, Skeggs and
Reay show how White working class boys and girls
work in ways which are 'oppositional to the
habitus of secondary institutions' and it is the
same for BACM (67). Race has been theoretically
marginalised in the past, just as social class was
in favour of stress on social mobility and
meritocracy. [Then some repetition about habitus
and its effects, the institutional habitus found
in universities and other institutions].
Atkinson (2011) objects to the identification of
habitus as being institutionalised, and argues it
can only be located in people: to do otherwise
"'completely steamrolls any internal heterogeneity
or dissension"', and denies the ability of
students to adapt or become mavericks. These may
be the exception rather than the norm however.
[More repetition on habitus for some reason
enabling him to talk about 'the likelihood of
alienation and conflict for students' and to bring
in hooks (68) and BACM culture specifically. Then
a revisit to cultural reproduction, more
repetition really. A revisit to the RAT issue
linked to the role of private schools {does he
identify this as a particular variable and
successful transition?}]
Chapter 5. CRT, Institutional
Racism, Misrecognition and the Intersection of
Capitals
CRT is introduced. Gillborn argues that race
should be a central focus [unlike
intersectionality then] and others have said that
although class is a major factor, race is also
crucial in interacting with it. The principles of
CRT then outlined — racism is typical and
ordinary, and 'permeates and negotiates every
aspect of White people's everyday attitudes' (75),
often subconscious; race is a social construction,
but not solely, because it is reproduced and has a
political and social context in colonialism and
slavery; neoliberal ideas of multiculturalism
silences race and has had the effect of
championing political correctness and identifying
problems as ones of tolerance rather than
inequality[nice point] ; there are broad
assumptions and beliefs that are 'deeply embedded'
[citing Foucault] which include Eurocentrism and
White privilege, '"an invisible package of
unearned assets"' (76), often invisible and seen
as normal' Whiteness becomes a matter of property.
Institutional racism follows from embodying the
assumptions of White people [and Gillborn 2009 is
cited as a major source here], together with
Harris. Gillborn knows that this is seen as
divisive by class theorists like Cole and
acknowledges that not all White people are equally
privileged, although they are all '"implicated in
these relations" but… "Do not all draw similar
benefits — but they do all benefit whether they
like it or not"' (79). This routine privilege is
the most dangerous form of White supremacy because
it is normal and embedded systems. Individuals are
socialised and educated into it and a meritocratic
view accompanies it, a form of misrecognition in
Bourdieu which makes it invisible.
Skeggs argues that White women, however, were
'consciously aware of how they were socially
positioned' (80). However a White hegemonic
discourse implies over determination for
nonWhites, while preserving Whiteness as
normative. Race is relevant only for some, while
Whiteness is invisible — at least to those who
inhabit it. [Still hasn't really addressed
Skeggs's point, nor explained why there is a
substantial rise in Black consciousness].
Education is particularly challenged as being
objective, neutral and meritocratic, and for
adopting colourblind policies. 'The problem is
that some Whites cannot practice true colour
blindness… Because they take for granted the
unconscious privilege and power that Whiteness
provides them' (81), and can still hold negative
stereotypes even while opposing blatant racism as
in the low expectations of teachers.
Intersectionality is now important as well because
it is now realised that 'bodies of colour do not
have a '"single, easily stated unitary identity"
(Delgado and Stefanci 2012)', and so might be
subject to multiple oppressions. Hall has said
that [nevertheless] race has been often omitted
from the dynamics of British society, and BME
knowledge excluded, we find this within the
'canonical academe of social sciences' as well,
with its 'traditional "epistemologies… [The]…
Result of social practices where powers being
exercised" (Hylton 2010)'. Apparently, though,
Harvey allows for critical social research to
expose oppressive mechanisms, like CRT.
There is also 'social and cultural capital within
in [sic] BME communities in the US' that might act
as sufficient sources of resistance or critique,
according to Yosso (2005). Black experience if
centred will recognise skills, capabilities and
cultural knowledge in the form of '"community
cultural wealth"' which includes: 'aspirational
capital… Linguistic capital… Familial capital… And
the inclusion of community… Social capital…
Navigational capital… Resistant capital' (83 – 4)
[looks useful, all in Yosso 2005] this provides a
theory of potential empowerment. Vincent and
others have also shown how the Black middle-class
can employ strategies to combat racial and social
injustice [presumably the school choice material].
However there may be 'negative and derogatory
psychological emotional consequences' (85) which
he intends to discuss later.
Acknowledging racism is difficult because it means
conceding that people have been victims and
acknowledging stigmatisation and this is shown in
several of his accounts.
Bodily hexis might be important and be mis-read as
'a "behavioural attitude"' by teachers for example
(85) [references to Gillborn among others] and
this again has cropped up in the participants
accounts.
There might be gender differences and class
differences. For example Black university men
might be able to produce a strategy that overlooks
every day racism — '"moderate Blackness"' (86).
Chapter 6 Methodology, methods and
design
He wanted to find out what experience was like
especially how race ethnicity gender, class and
culture accounted for their constructions of their
identity and their ability to succeed. He begins
with his own biography, a Black a male influenced
by feminist approaches. He is American and older
than the participants. Keen on qualitative notions
on lived experiences and constructions,
participants counter stories, and focus on the
relationship between researcher and researched,
Bourdieu [but not the stuff on understanding?]. He
acknowledges his personal experience on his
ontological position and discusses epistemology
[all very personal]. Claims to be Bourdieusian
[but no quantitative?]. A bit on reflexivity.
Positionality and the need to be self-critical.
His personal story to indicate his ontology. He is
African-American but of immigrant descent rather
than slavery. Both parents are in education. He
attended predominantly White schools but
experienced racism at secondary school, and some
segregation in terms of friendship. His parents
supported him in occasional challenges to
teachers. He experienced otherness at the doctoral
level as well and experienced self-doubt as a
result of affirmative action, even though most BME
students 'were not accepted into the law school
based on affirmative action policies, but based on
merits and a multiplicity of other factors
(including class)' (94). Then he was a consultant
in the Department of Health in the USA addressing
inequalities in BME listening to stories. Then he
relocated to Cardiff and was surprised by the
'lack of educated, successful, BME population'
(95) so he set out to gain access to the
community, particularly to resist the usual story
of Black boys' underachievement and educational
failure in the popular media.
He became interested in racism through Stuart Hall
and the idea that race is the modality for class,
although he thinks that race 'overrides class
inequalities in some situations' (95). However he
wants to remain open to multiple dimensions. CRT
influenced his work, especially the value placed
on experiential stories. He saw it necessary to
provide a setting for BME voices especially BACM,
and how they have interpreted events and made
sense of their experiences, in HE and in early
employment. He knows that these will be
'"subjective" stories' (99).
He decided to avoid questionnaires and to have
conversations instead, to listen to talk about
experiences. Oral history rather than statistical
data. Qualitative research in face-to-face and
follow-up Skype interviews with 16 participants.
There was a topic guide, 'third objects' and a
video to help share stories. There were follow-up
interviews and then a third interview after
graduation, both of which were designed to clarify
any misunderstandings. In some cases there was a
fourth interview. Interviews ranged between 15
minutes and one hour 45 minutes. The aim was to
develop thick descriptions including 'observing
body language' and reviewing transcripts. He
developed both traditional and contemporary
grounded theory 'juxtaposed with CRT' (101). Line
by line coding helped in 'opening up the data' and
immersing himself in it. Contemporary grounded
theory offers more of a challenge to the concept
of researcher as author and stresses instead
researcher as co-constructor, not looking for
truth or reality, but rather demonstrating
multiple realities. There are limitations [and he
considers them].
Semistructured interviews were the main collection
techniques followed by a narrative approach.
Participants had to be home students, living for
the majority of the time in the UK. Universities
were chosen to be Russell group or Oxbridge,
within reasonable distance. Bourdieu also
distinguishes between elite higher education and
other mass university systems which serve to
perpetuate the privileges and advantages of the
elite, and he finds similarities in the dichotomy
between new universities and the Russell group and
Oxbridge sector.
He used purposive and snowball sampling, after
gaining access from gatekeepers at the
universities — he stressed the positive aspects,
finding examples of success and the beneficial
strategies of BACM identify, as well as the usual
stuff about confidentiality. He recruited through
Facebook and the African Caribbean societies in
each campus. 14 prospective participants never
responded. He used his own contacts but still had
difficulty accessing participants. His sample
overrepresented females. He took care to gain
informed consent. In the end for participants were
recruited from Oxbridge and 13 from Russell group.
Most identified as BACM, 2 claimed to be mixed
origin. Some were very much a minority in their
institutions. The follow-up interviews were with
graduates within the past five years.
He also classified them according to how they
defined their own class and the area of study they
pursued in a table on 110 [8 working class, only 4
British Caribbean, lots of British African]
It is important to study people who are seldom
heard so he tried to get them to discuss their
views by interviewing them in friendly locations
and establishing good rapport and trust, by
sharing some of his own background, for example,
and stressing the importance of their views, or
developing open ended questions asking to share
information and so on. He also developed 'neutral
body language'(113). He recorded the interviews,
initially on video, but there was no time to fully
analyse those. He took particular care not to try
and influence the answers.
Interview questions focused on the '"capitals"
that aided them in their ascendance to and
completion of University' (115), how they felt
about belonging, and their experiences on
completion of University. There were sub-
questions or prompts which were occasionally
revised and refined. He did pilot study with two
BACM [examples of the schedule appearing the table
on 117]. All interviews were transcribed verbatim,
nine of them by external transcribers.
Third objects were used, 'usually tools that are
used in some form of therapeutic work with
children' (118) which can provoke better
communication and relieve stress and anxiety. They
are usually 'tools such as games, drawings,
pictures, stories or short films'. He used
'pictures of university students in various
settings related the social life' [for example
including diverse participants] and asked about
whether any resonated with their experiences. He
also used a 'cufflink exercise' — participants had
to choose three different cufflinks that reminded
them of their mother, father or someone special
who had had an impact on their life: they then had
to explain why the cufflink was significant.
Apparently it broke the ice. He also used a
satirical video to prompt talk about experience
with racism and discrimination [it was called
'"shit White girls say to Black girls"'].
Participants were paid for the interview.
He justifies the qualitative approach in the usual
way, and discusses some problems [usual ones, but
mostly the strengths of counterstories]. There is
a possibility of emotional distress requiring
counselling contacts, or concerns about privacy.
Some participants may 'go off on a tangent' (123)
and this apparently did happen although he is
prepared to accept that it was all relevant and
meaningful for them. He was aware that he was both
insider and outsider and that researcher from a
different background 'may have drawn different
conclusions from the data'. He did experience of
challenging understanding their perspectives on
occasion.
He goes on to discuss grounded theory, and then
there's some more stuff on how he transcribed and
coded the data. The latter involve deciding what
to do with 'multiple themes'. He used NVivo. He
selected dominant themes and compared them with
current literature. It was difficult to
standardise themes, however He was after
exploration 'rather than theory verification'
(127). He wanted to triangulate grounded theory
with feminist theory and CRT. There are objections
to the claims of grounded theory, including those
that appear to deny the researchers part in making
meaning.
Apparently he also assigned participants to
socio-economic classes based on what they said
about housing, schooling and parental background.
There were problems with migrants, for example in
recognising university qualifications gained in
Africa. So he settled for self-analysis.
Key themes emerging were 'sharing experiences,
participants' accounts of teachers' perceptions of
their performativity at school, parental hopes and
aspirations… Capitals and resources known and
unknown… Social and academic experiences of being
Black and Black culture… On elite university
campuses, Black students worldviews: their effect
on how racism and discrimination are/are not
recognised at elite HEI's' (130).
He was keen to pursue reflexivity and consider
ethical issues including informed consent,
although this can sometimes be seen as
'bureaucratic' and reflect 'power dynamics' (133)
[citing Hammersley]. There were emotions raised
during the interviews, and this sometimes had the
effect where 'participants appear to have merged
and/or minimised recollections of victimisation'
(134). Sometimes participants were in tears. He
offered them counselling sometimes.
Chapter 7 Black Men's Trajectories
into higher education
There were several main 'deal breakers'.
Six of the 15 described themselves as '"bad boys"'
who had misbehaved (137) this might have given
them some capital in some cultural working class
environments in the neighbourhoods and schools in
which they lived. They had to fit in even though
they were academically good — one respondent said
it was necessary to fight to gain respect, to
perform tough. The trick was not to be excluded
and to stay in the top sets — this respondent was
needed by the school wanting to improve its rating
status. When he finally went to a private school
he changed his behaviour. Another respondent also
performed 'cultural masculinity and dominance' in
an underperforming school (139) but avoided the
harshest sanctions because he was bright —
sanctions were graded according to academic
performance — teachers 'cut him a bit of slack'
(140). Both reported a tendency to label Black
boys as underperforming, however and as being
stereotypically perceived as hard or masculine
aggressive. This led to double pressure on the
less achieving Black boys, although some teachers
'turned a blind eye' to some of the bright
students' bad behaviour. White students also had a
double standard and those with behavioural
problems were sanctioned but not as severely as
the Black mixed-race ones. A '"forceful way of
talking… [And]… Other performative representations
of their culture' (142) also led to
misunderstandings. There were similarities to Willis's latds
We are describing here forms of cultural capital
which do provide benefits like respect from other
students and prevent these kids from being beaten
up, although, it is also 'recognised as a
liability by teachers', often misrecognised, and
punished with relegation to lower sets.
Nevertheless, some teachers saw the potential in
some Black kids and gave them preferential
treatment. In one case, this might have been
because 'he embodied more middle-class habitus
than his friends' (143). Different behaviour in
different schools indicates '"double
consciousness"' as in Dubois and Fanon. Private
schools did not associate being smart with stigma.
Other respondents talked about being lucky or
fortunate in being able to get on academically,
attending a particularly good school even though
it was located in a rough area, for example, or if
it valued particular unusual skills, not only
sports but singing in choirs [a faith-based school
with a success ethic].
Some had parents who were capable of playing the
game to find suitable schools, for example using
'"school catchment surfing"' (147 )[with some of
the dilemmas mentioned in the ESRC studies]. Mothers'
aspirations seem quite important, and there is a
hint of social and cultural capital enabling them
to gain access to good schools. Other mothers
mentioned university from an early age, and
mentioned it frequently in childhood, even
steering them onto suitable pathways, away from
working class occupations, sometimes even
stressing specific subjects 'particularly law,
science, technology, engineering and mathematics'
(150).
There is an emphasis on possession of suitable
cultural capital and social capital — 'academic,
work experience, financial, and knowing the
system' going through formal and informal means.
Proper knowledge about elite universities was
important, sometimes from families or from special
school programs, or from awareness of financial
incentives [one to go to LSE]. These had positive
impacts on competence and motivation. Sometimes
churches provided information as well as 'the
grapevine'. Living in London helped. One gained an
internship before attending university.
There was variable knowledge about the Oxbridge
process especially the interview and the fear of
disadvantage [one had a particularly bad
experience]. They often lacked resources to
prepare for the interview and came from schools
that were not familiar with the process. They had
sometimes ruled it out. Sometimes the schools and
colleges have ruled it out. Personal contacts or
school visits, or school trips to Oxbridge
supplied a counter — six out of the eight who
applied had visited on open days and all found the
experience rewarding. Nevertheless, class has
often been identified as a factor in self
exclusion, and visit days can overcome or confirm
this feeling [it overcame it for one respondent].
Language and performativity seem particularly
important especially in interviews. One successful
candidate posed as a rough diamond and saw the
problem as articulation or coming across, the need
to 'express symbolic capital through language
appearance and presentation or performance' (159).
There is a double consciousness here shown in the
need to learn the different cultural performance
'or bodily hexis''. Some never succeeded and
always felt unwelcome or self excluded.
Chapter 8. Trajectories in Elite
Higher Education: Being a Black Man on Campus
This refers to their experiences and how they
responded to discriminatory occurrences sometimes
when they were perceived as others. Elite
universities have a key role in social
reproduction and they do this by rewarding
cultural capital associated with the dominant
class. There is little literature applying this to
ethnic minorities, however although we can borrow
Bourdieu.
11 of the 15 participants experienced being other
during the transition. One respondent attending an
elite university where there were few Black
students experienced 'cynicism, isolation and
exclusion' (165). He did not fit in and did not
understand himself sufficiently in order to be
able to fit in. Another got to Oxbridge but he was
more middle-class. However White students
perceived him in a different way than he saw
himself — a bit more of a novelty, with more
ambiguity, with some discomfort but no outright
hostility — he is 'reluctant to acknowledge that
he is seen as different due to racism or
discrimination' (167). He doesn't think he must
fit in and that not blending in is
'inconsequential' because Oxbridge is so tiny.
CRT can help here by affirming the 'centrality of
culture and race' (169) and the importance of
otherness. Some respondents reported that as well,
in the form of quite strong reactions of surprise
or judgement, asking if they were really British
[so repeating micro-aggressions really,
specifically argued on 170] this produced sadness
and frustration at low expectations by White
students. This was exacerbated by often being the
only Black person on campus, which led to them
usually being labelled as international students.
Class differences were also prominent, perhaps
dominant. One respondent noticed that most of his
fellows were 'posh' and had been to private
schools, although he himself was
lower-middle-class. He did not aspire to be fully
middle-class [classic].
One respondent became particularly aware of being
Black, made aware by White companions, made
paranoid [almost a rehearsal of the elevator scene
in Yancy (173)]. They
found it hard to make friends. Sometimes they
struggled with particularly unpleasant stereotypes
by White people — Black people were musclebound,
or aggressive and violent. Car thieves. Sometimes
this was more tied to class. However it is common
for the respondents not to identify 'the
occurrences as being racist or discriminatory'
especially if they were friends with the
perpetrator — this is a refusal to accept that a
friend harbours racist perspectives (176) and the
preferred interpretation is that friend is
ignorant. This keeps the peace, maintains the
friendship, avoids being seen as a troublemaker
although it makes racism less formal and more
difficult to detect.
There are particular stereotypes about 'food,
styles and social mores' (177). One respondent
reports questions being asked about how Black men
treat women, whether they would only take them to
chicken places or treat them properly, and this
caused surprise at elite universities. The same
expectations extend to music or clothes. Again the
tendencies to turn these views into 'harmless
ignorance'(179) to moderate anger and keep the
peace.
There are also accounts of inequities in support
for study, being excluded from 'peer to peer
revision and tutorial support'. One respondent of
Oxbridge did not have '"any personal relationships
with tutors"' (180). Another reported a lack of
study buddies. One blamed himself for not taking
advantage of opportunities. Another said that he
had not realised how the system worked and how
important it was to have '"parents with
connections"' [he was a law student]. Some had
more positive relationships with their tutors —
one had a Black personal tutor.
Generally all this shows that embodied social and
cultural capital is still important in its effect
on relationships both with lecturers and other
students, because of the misalignment of habitus,
or a failure to recognise the rules of the field
[hints of Bernstein on transformational grammar
here]. These can include informal rules like study
rules forming student groups and so on.
Four respondents had a particular fear of failure,
a confidence deficit even after acceptance. And
thought that this had something to do with being
Black. They lacked the reassurance that
middle-class White kids had. They were afraid of
missing out on their one chance, to focused on the
first step of actually getting in, lacking the
overconfidence of dominant groups and their sense
of entitlement.
Chapter 9 Bodily Hexis and Playing
the Cultural Performativity/'Moderate Blackness'
Game: Switching up… Or Not
There are different ways to perform Black culture
and different ways of perceiving it. A key element
is respectability shown in clothing, jewelry,
language and how to behave and be masculine these
are '"embodied cultural capital"' for Bourdieu.
Many had to adjust or conform.
One British Caribbean was isolated at first. He
was wearing a baseball cap and big coat and looked
like a hoodlum and only the Asian kids sat in the
same row as him. — They had come from diverse
neighbourhoods. Bourdieu sees bodily hexis as '"a
political mythology realised, embodied, turned
into a permanent disposition, a durable manner of
standing, speaking and thereby of feeling and
thinking"' (191). It consists of motor skills and
postures. The respondent in question finally
realised that students were scared of him. He was
a bit hostile at first. It was partly the way he
seemed angry when he spoke. This is similar to the
way in which working class secondary schools are
presumed to be troublemakers because there
performativity is misrecognised. This may be
'hegemonic masculinity' (192), but race is also
factor.
It has been argued since that masculinity 'is
complicated and requires exploration into its
frequently fragmented and variable constructions
and configurations' (193), and CRT can help by
addressing different dominant capitals via Yosso:
they may be differently valued in local
communities or fields. Having to adjust in higher
education can act as a threat to authenticity and
selfhood. Interaction is sometimes easier
following categorisation into stereotypes, and
some reworkings of performativity might involve
'"moderate Blackness"' (194) [attributed to
Wilkins 2012]. One respondent refers to it as
switching up, not wearing particular types of
clothes, changing the ways in which you talk, it
is like double consciousness. However, it can
appear to be 'a mark of dishonesty' (194), as
ambiguous as passing, selling out. However most of
the participants adopted some 'adjustment or
adaptation of their habitus'(195) [one who
resisted more than others was a working class
British Caribbean]. The same person did not engage
very much out of university even though it would
have made him feel more at home. He stayed 'true
to his local community culture'.
Another respondent said that he had not changed
much but had stayed '"true to myself"' (196)
except for at his interview, although he did
accept the need to change sometime. The former
respondent insisted that cultural norms were
arbitrary. Only three of the 15 offered any sort
of counter narrative explaining their refusal to
conform to fit in.
Social origins influence language [Bernstein is
cited here as well as Bourdieu and Passeron]. The
ESRC studies are cited to show how middle-class
parents obtain and maintain cultural resources
that align with White middle-class schools
habitus. This is reported by several participants
as well, especially 'language and how it was
spoken' (197). One had elocution lessons at prep
school, one middle-class one claimed to speak
English better than White people 'in a particular
precise/highbrow/BBC manner' (198) and saw this as
gaining respect. Robert [?] has suggested that
Black middle-class people sometimes actively and
knowingly use class signifiers like 'language,
voice, intonation, dress' to get acceptance and
the participants had some examples where they do
this. Such strategies did 'mitigate and/or
minimise' racial stereotyping and racism and was a
way of dealing with it.
Another participant talked about developing 'a
"telephone voice"' (199) taught by his mother who
was a secretary, and he used this at his Russell
group university, he also showed double
consciousness as he moved between communities and
was aware that he might be seen as 'a "sell-out"'
or '"posh"' (200).. He had made a conscious
decision to present himself differently in
different environments and did not experience the
'tug-of-war' experienced by others. He, like
others, said that adjustments like this avoided
having ignorance and prejudice directed at them.
There was even an acknowledgement of aspiring to
be middle-class, at least in fitting in a bit,
becoming versatile to some extent.
Their success shows that their habitus is
'adaptable, transformative, less fixed and more
permeable and responsive' than some researchers
have thought (202). However, as Reay argues, there
can be '"psychic costs… And tensions"', and
students risk being caught offguard. One
respondent felt that he had taught some of his
close friends a little about Caribbean patois in
exchange.
One respondent reported surprise where people
actually met him, after perhaps hearing him on the
phone or hearing him speak or apply for
placements, sometimes even when he is
professionally dressed. He has noted the
'discriminatory presumptions' of White people
[which are also mixed with class, indeed forming
'an intersection of class and race' (204)].
Sometimes these initial presumptions can provide
an advantage preventing negative assumptions
developing, and thereby gaining a kind of
'enhanced status' even though they might be
challenged by other Black people as being
inauthentic. Skeggs sees this as allied to Goffman
on dealing with marginalisation, disconnecting
oneself from a part of a frame or construct — what
Gilroy has called '"shape shifting"' [sometimes
colonial masters required Black people to do this,
and this had personal and psychological costs].
This particular respondent also thought that it
pleased Black people to see him being so positive
in achieving something, acting as a role model
[sic], aiding his role in community activism
(206).
Nevertheless, several [8] respondents reported the
stubborn persistence of White stereotypes, seeing
Black people as gangsters, failing to distinguish
them from being urban or 'generic'. One thought
that Black people understood diversity better than
White people [rather puzzling references to
figures in popular culture to explain] (208), but
that diversity among Black people was seen as too
much.
Chapter 10 Worldviews and the
Management of Racism and Discrimination.
There are different responses possible including
'the discourse of surprise and tolerance' (211).
There may be a conscious choice to respond,
including confrontation or minimisation [I really
don't see the big deal about minimisation — is
what we all do]. There may be gender differences
and class differences. Moderate Blackness has been
discussed and depends on the form of cultural
capital [there is some ambivalence about whether
it can be learned]. Racism can be understood as
ignorance or denial. 10 of the 16 were routinely
involved in integrated situations which 'enable
them to maintain equanimity and good cross-racial
relationships', and this particularly helped to
develop emotional restraint.
One respondent reported an Asian girl using the
term Nigger and him objecting in a forceful way
after being physically upset — he was unable to
moderate his Blackness, although the woman
apologised later and he accepted that and even
blamed himself for not behaving properly.
One possibility involves disengagement, denying
the problem, tuning out, although there are costs
and benefits to be analysed here. Two participants
encountered the difficulties. One was thrown out
of the club after a violent incident and were
labelled by the police as the cause of the problem
although they amicably resolved it in the end,
seeing it as a mistake rather than discrimination
— 'attributional ambiguity' (215). Another
respondent, also present, confirmed the
understanding, although he was more suspicious
about what would have happened had they decided
not to play it safe — he was still puzzled, but
had come to realise that there were prejudiced
conceptions at work.
Anger is still a frequent response but
participants were aware that it was risky to act
on it, a possible wrong step, jeopardising earlier
hard work and producing criminal records. Even
raising a complaint could be counter-productive.
Playing it safe was easier.
There were reports of being treated differently by
White staff — in six accounts [these are still
called counter narratives incidentally]. One
respondent was called a moron because he had
missed the first class and had not realised there
was homework: the lecturer was reacting to the
baseball cap and the big coat. Others picked up on
misconceptions about Black students and
misrecognitions — not realising that Black people
were students, or assuming that they had only got
there through access courses. They had seen that
the assumptions were not made of equivalent
students who were White, even if they were working
class or female. They attributed the
discrimination to their clothing or more generally
to the 'way they presented themselves' (218).
One respondent accused lecturers of being '"either
classist or racist or something"' excessively
hostile, with a '"hostile undertone"'. They felt
there were issues, even discrimination, although
perhaps they were '"just being paranoid"'. This
respondent did not confront, and saw the responses
being down to class and race. The issue was how
his 'body is perceived or misrecognised by his
lecturer', a form of symbolic violence in
Bourdieu. The respondent felt there were
insufficient grounds to prove his case and this
was common. 11 of the participants accepted the
consequences and saw it as 'impractical to
challenge' and preferred to let it all go
unspoken. There is indeed 'a substantial degree of
dubiousness as to whether circumstances that
occurred are in actuality the result of racism' [I
am not sure whether this remark is expressing the
views of the respondents — I think so, because
this is followed by a sentence referring to 'the
implicit yet subtle nature of covert racism
enables micro-aggressions to go unchallenged'
(221).
Another respondent experiences a 'discriminatory
slight from a lecturer' when he is called Tiny
Temper, after [the lecturer] trying to use rap as
a pedagogy. The lecturer apologised for picking on
him. He walked out rather than confront. Five
others talked about 'being racially insulted in
front of a full lecture hall' (222) and all saw
the cost of reactions as excessive — they
preferred a moderation of Blackness, a matter of
keeping calm to carry on while focusing on getting
the degree. At the same time, this may be an
example of students not feeling safe, as in hooks,
not feeling welcome or being treated as fairly,
and two respondents did seem to illustrate this.
Some participants used accounts to overcome
threats to self esteem. One said that he thought
covert or indirect racism was '"a myth"' (223),
that people either were racists or not. This could
be 'a product of moderate Blackness', a way of
coping with prejudice and discrimination, a
'neoliberal meritocratic worldview' that helps him
see people as fair and egalitarian overall. The
occurrences likely to be construed as 'ignorant…
Not deliberately done' (224), which helps maintain
the worldview.
Seven of the participants were able to distinguish
between acceptable and unacceptable comments or
actions. Several said that Black people were
always going to experience some degree of racism
implying that some discrimination must be
tolerated, that it might even be acceptable among
friends as long as it is not made public. Others
were taught to deal with it by inspiring teachers
— '"just be the best that you can be"' and forget
about racism, and this is a common theme (225).
Racism is just another example of 'poor and
disrespectful psychological and interpersonal
attitudes of people towards each [other]',
disregarding its 'prevalent ingrained and
institutionalised significance', failing to see
the link with '"real" structural cultural material
and symbolic effects' [surprising for the
researcher. Blimey, even contradicts Hall!].
One respondents saw personal behaviours as the
culprit, racism as subjective, difficult to prove,
'not worthy of challenging'. This is only 'a form
of racism management and protection to enable
James to maintain focus on his goals' (226), and
to be severely contradicted by the researcher:
'racism is not a personality disorder or
irrational prejudice. It is an ingrained complex,
contradictory and anti-human social practice that
is everywhere [quoting Hall]'.
Another respondent was aware of racism and
discrimination but emphasised that his parents had
refused to accept them as a deterrent. He had even
realised that the police were racist and that
things were hard for his immigrant parents, but
they wanted him to do well nevertheless and to be
ambitious and not to '"blame my circumstances on
anyone other than myself"' (227) [and he was a
working class British African Oxbridge graduate]
The concept of post-racial or race neutral society
helps conceal and legitimise racism by denying it,
recreating racism as symbolic power. Those who
have some 'personal control over their lives had a
decreased likelihood to see themselves as victims
of racism (Shoery et al. 2002)', and a
meritocratic worldview means that people are
responsible for their own outcomes [again,
Goldthorpe is cited here]. White people who adopt
meritocracy helps them regard themselves as high
in merit and deny racial privilege — they
internalise their own norms and so do some Black
students.
Six of his participants denied racism in public
spaces in discourses. Acknowledging racism was a
mere deterrent to focusing on personal goals and
risked being singled out as a complainer or
troublemaker, especially in universities. They had
experienced discrimination but excused it as being
down to lack of knowledge about Black people. One
had experienced working in a 'magic circle law
firm', and noted the ambiguity of deciding whether
the rejection of a Black person was on the basis
of merit or race. He was paired with a [rare]
mixed race person and was one of only two Black
people. The White people explained that it was
easier '"to hire someone that you think you are
going to get on well with if someone comes from a
similar background"' (229), but '"if you're very
good then they looked beyond all of that"'. The
researcher thought that might be subconscious
racism, but the respondent denied it, and said it
was just a matter of wondering whether the
newcomer might not enjoy it. The researcher says
this is an example of misrecognition based on his
meritocratic worldview. The respondent has
attended an elite university with good grades, has
conformed to the habitus of the institution and
believes that 'he now embodies the class capitals
necessary to be considered recognisable to this
firm' (230). He also attributes his success to his
Protestant faith and hard work. Accepting that he
faced discrimination would mean a serious blow to
his worldview and achievement ethic.
For another respondent, racism was always coupled
with aggression and intention. Further, Black
people were responsible for explaining why
something is offensive without calling it out,
because it often reflected inquisitive remarks or
ignorance. Again this contradicts the literature
and is best seen as a coping strategy. It may even
have a 'detrimental effect on society' (232) by
remaining silent about racism.
[At last he acknowledges that] 'for most people
there is a desire for frequent, positive and
stable interactions with others… People make
efforts to try to get along with everyone'. This
means that racism is not acknowledged or
confronted and some of the respondents may be
'exercising discrimination dis-identification
techniques… To avoid being stigmatised as "other"
and to gain acceptance and belonging from the "in
groups"… In this case the predominantly White
middle-class group at their universities'.
The video prompt did help respondents to discuss
discrimination and racism, however. Even so, one
respondents said that most of the racist comments
were made in fun. Another said that he had 'never
experienced racism in University' except as
'banter', again interpreted as a defensive
strategy, avoiding being seen as politically
correct or unable to take a joke, to the surprise
of the interviewer. Racism is seen as belonging to
the past. Seven of the participants had accounts
similar to this. Again this may be 'a way to
explain away or deny the possible instances of
racism' (233), responding to 'strong expectations
of how he should act within these White
middle-class organisations'.
Back to the literature, White middle-class
positions have considerable symbolic power which
they naturalise, and force incomers to neutralise.
[Using the video might have encouraged this
tendency to reduce racism do something humorous —
comments about wanting to touch Black people's
hair, for example is sometimes seen as
'non-aggressive, non-malicious, unintentional and
nonracist']. At the same time, one respondent at
least recognised that he was in a rather
privileged environment interacting with
'reasonably minded people' (235), and that he had
acted appropriately, giving White people no
grounds to make negative assumptions.
This is interpreted as more of a deliberate
strategy to facilitate acceptance, double
consciousness again, 'adaptive survival techniques
implemented to enable marginalised groups to
perform as though they are part of someone else's
reality' (236) [and not modifying their own
realities]. He can relate to this and is aware of
his own double consciousness and [intends?]
only to moderate or naturalise. One respondent did
have an emotional reaction to the video and did
not see it as very humorous but actually rather
hurtful. The same respondent said that he had
confronted racism in the past although wanted to
avoid being labelled as an angry Black man or
troublemaker.
[Rather disappointing for CRT enthusiasts as
counter narratives, and requiring a fair bit of
interpretation to see them as deliberate
strategies. Even then, more than a hint of victimhood]
|
|